InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

SEBASS

01/25/06 12:31 AM

#19665 RE: orlander_file #19664

Perhaps, but they wrote exacly what i was thinking but with more detail and more proof that i could produce. But we were on the same path with me being early to the plate. I didn't even like Motley Fool before the article. I can't see what intrest would this independent publication have but people with agenda will aways try to flip the coin. That's the problem in my opinion. Avoiding facts, spininng negative news to positive and giveing more and more and more time to the company that failed to produce a single $1 from other buisness units for 2 yrs. The rule on the market is if in 18 months company fails to capitalize on business plan then dump and run as far as you can but what do they know. GTE board members know best, even more then Motley Fool, Sebass, Rupert Murdoc, Cramer and others.
icon url

crashman

01/25/06 8:22 AM

#19670 RE: orlander_file #19664

orlander, as a last comment to MF, I think that the responsibility ultimately lies with the chief editor for allowing someone to just vomit something onto the keyboard and publish it. Thats why MF will go down eventually. JMO, no skin of my back.