InvestorsHub Logo

Toxic Avenger

11/12/13 10:02 AM

#14578 RE: OBhands #14577

Monk's involvement pretty much was the definition of pump and dump. And Monk was all over PNTV, and they were all over him.

mrPiNK

11/12/13 10:06 AM

#14579 RE: OBhands #14577

OB you speak the truth. The CEO mark b is a hard worker with a vision. He has (a miracle in this environment) kept the SS low. He has complied with every sec rule along the way, even with his s1 credit line.

There are never guarantees in pinks or business, but you cannot call PNTV a scam. It has a business plan and model it continues to try to execute on. If it fails, worse case somebody grabs this play for it's very significant tax loss carry forward, which makes this perfect shell worth about .20 cents to any suitor.

jetpilot1101

11/12/13 10:24 AM

#14583 RE: OBhands #14577

A bit defensve are we? Point to one thing in the post you replied to where I said PNTV was a scam.

I'm sure your beloved CEO Mark is doing everything in his power to "make this happen". The problem is, I heard that 3 years ago when the stock was trading in the .20 - .30 range and look where it is today. I hear this same excuse a lot with pink stinker CEOs and it is always echoed by those who bought way too many shares and really "believe" the CEO is going to make it happen. Let me know when he does but I won't hold my breath.

BTW, I spoke with Mr. Mark Bradley about 3 years ago. He had me snookered back then but I have since seen the light. And as for the connection between M*IX and PNTV, let's just say I have found some very interesting names on the list of those who were issued M*IX shares for "services rendered". But I'll let you do your own DD on the list, I've done mine.

Oh and BTW, PNTV is a scam.