Replies to post #8066 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[WisePolicalEconomist]

I think chemistry remains important for as long as LWLG can tune the materials for specific operations. We have already seen the move from Perkinamine Classic, to NR to Indigo. I am betting that if my understanding is correct, they may as many as 100 configurations of the material, that each maybe specifically tailored for individual tasks. This is why Perkinamine can be thought of as a platform. I bet refinement of the chemistry will be a job that never really ends.

All speculating or reading between the lines but I believe that the specs were left out because they are anticipating quite improved results. By mentioning the CC by year end, they are buying themselves another 2 months to refine the product or even build a second generation prototype based on all they learned the first time around, it should be much quicker turn-around. I think they believe that they can get the specs to a level that they blow away naysayers and adoption becomes an industry imperative.

I just wish I didn't have to guess so damn much and that things moved faster but to me this is certainly good progress and milestone in my book.

Why is the 3rd party a secret? That does bother me.

-WISEGUY

[Pro_v12001]

Odd,

I agree with you but as always these guys keep everything tight to the vest. I think however what we need to be aware of his is the fact that Tom said he would have a prototype, we have one now. This first generation prototype already is faster than what is common place and also uses less power. THIS IS HUGE.

[pitcook]

Odd, I think we may feel underwhelmed to some degree because of the ridiculous connecting of the dots by some of the IH "experts". If anyone truly understands that as a developmental stage science/technology company, it is a slow arduous process to change the world.

Those that even talked about us getting bought out years ago are really misleading some people to buy this stock. I am very long and still strong but there are still a ton of hoops to jump through before we are ready to sell the Goo to somebody for profit on a regular basis.

I don't understand why the name of the third party and any other relevant numbers were withheld? As Mr. Smith brought to our attention, if he was correct, they need to prove in a publicly proven demonstration whatever the science world needs to see done, and repeated as needed. Hopefully that will be next in this process.