InvestorsHub Logo

capnmike

10/09/13 4:46 PM

#41488 RE: Crow3 #41487

Crow3, you published this statement....

"I don't believe that anyone CARES what the shelf life of a loaded drip bag is. "

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=92838940

==============================

I know from years of direct experience, and I will use your wording here to augment the evidence I have provided, with more to come if you wish, and right on target.....

MANY PHARMACY COMPOUNDING PROFESSIONALS (and informed patients, family members, pharmaceutical manufacturers, etc) "DO CARE what the shelf life of a loaded drip bag is. "

Some care so much that a big part of their career focuses on the shelf life of a loaded drip bag (your description).
The ValiMed G4 system can obviously gain the interest of a global medical technology company so they can use it in their lab and on projects that have to do with shelf life, potency (or changes in potency as the case may be), etc.

Crow3

10/09/13 4:49 PM

#41489 RE: Crow3 #41487

http://scopeblog.stanford.edu/2012/10/08/study-expiration-dates-have-nothing-to-do-with-shelf-life-of-drugs/

Even years after the expiration date, potency not compromised.. according to the Stanford study.

Pill makers are required by statute to put an expiration date on prescribed meds. They will not "guarantee" potency after that date.

They are happy to comply with the statutes. Not scientific logic. No money in logic.