InvestorsHub Logo

MTM

10/08/13 2:56 PM

#22757 RE: Kingrudy #22756

Agreed. Such contracts are not good. Expect more dilution. The recent uptick in volume is quite easily seen from the shares issued to various parties under Rule 144 in prior periods. This rule has expired for those shares and the people that require liquidity are getting it while they can. Frankly, I'm surprised that the market could absorb that many shares without depressing the price even further. CYPW's capital structure is quite messed, with far too many shares issued. Mismanagement in the extreme.

BTW, the claim of the second Russian Patent is beyond stupid and has descended to just plain silly. That's got a net worth of about $1.50. I'm sure that they paid their attorneys in shares as well since they have no cash. That may explain some of the volume. We'll see what the 3rd quarter or 4th qaurter reports reveal.

pennypicker42

10/09/13 9:40 AM

#22759 RE: Kingrudy #22756

I would've thought they would have learned their lesson about non delivery penalties. The rest confuses me. I'll let you know if I find anything but so far??