Replies to post #14022 on Zerify Inc (ZRFY)

[Optimistic Trader]

Yes, my opinion and ask mgmt. if it is their model or not. I think they will get some sales each quarter, but I think they will keep the boat afloat any way they have to - to get to infringement targets. Most companies would have been toast years ago...there is know how and drive behind SFOR and Blank Rome. I'm sure in 12 years mgmt. could have kicked themselves in the a@@ a few times and wished they would have done some things differently, but haven't we all messed up a time or two in the past 12 years? I have! The thing is, from a technical standpoint SFOR stinks...if one believes they have the product and can litigate well - then there can be enormous value ahead...if one thinks not - then SFOR probably isn't the right stock/company for them.

[Optimistic Trader]

You can bet any contract is reviewed and in positioned to benefit SFOR better than ever by SFOR's lawyers (don't want another WhiteSky situation).

You can bet SFOR's lawyers are telling them what content is ok and not ok in PRs, and when they should be sent out.

You can bet their lawyers are advising what they can say to investors/shareholders and what they cannot.

You can bet some of the litigation would have already been done (and not in SFOR's favor) if they didn't have Blank Rome...without Blank Rome...it would be harder for SFOR to move forward in a favorable way.

Blank Rome may not be entirely running the ship, but they have their hands close to the wheel.

[rolo731]

I beg to differ - big lawyer firms take cases on a contingency basis if the rewards are large enough and don't need much cash up front. They always take a 'risk assessment' before committing themselves in that fashion..... :-)

[lazyeye]

Gotta tell ya, I have to agree with you. The company is struggling to make a sale and a lawsuit that will probably never go SFOR's way (see failed injunction http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-jersey/njdce/2:2013cv01895/287242/49) isn't going to help.

They need sales. When I see this from 3 years ago on Kay's twitter,

Mark L Kay ?@marklkay 6 May 10

working on selling StrikeForce's keystroke encryption and malware keylogger prevention software

and then I see the small amount of sales and the amount of new shares issued in those 3 years, I can help but wonder wth this guy is doing.

Now, to clear up the "how can this be a scam" issue:

FACT: A company can file with the SEC, follow all the rules, be transparent, accessible etc, AND, AND do the things Kay has done: A ridiculous pat yourself on the back PR now and then (see Aug 6) and issue shares up the wazoo and dilute the crap out of shareholders. This guy is smart. He's hiding in plain site in my opinion.

One more thing: How in the HAIL can 6 million people have downloaded this crap as claimed and result in such low revenue? Somebody not doin their job!

One one more thing: I'll say it again, read the last 10K (and try not to vomit) and TELL ME THAT THE TOP THREE GUYS DESERVE $2.8 MILLION COMBINED COMPENSATION YEARLY!!

ALL of you should TAKE ISSUE WITH MARK KAY AND NOT EACH OTHER!

That all said, this can go to .0001 or it can go to .005...place your bets with what you can afford to lose. SFOR needs $100K a month to survive. They have about $30K a month in revenue. They also have buku conversions in the wings. Do the math.

Nobody should be high fiving anyone with Kay at the helm right now, the conversions in sight, the ridiculous salaries and the paltry sales. Pinning hopes for the company on Blank Rome is dangerous and keeps the target off Kay's back, which it shouldn't!!.