InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BADALI

10/01/13 12:58 PM

#14257 RE: Fat Thor #14256

Agree. They used word "IF" about R/S in their PR.

Stockholders should recognize that if a reverse split is affected, they will own a fewer number of shares than they presently own (a number equal to the number of shares owned immediately prior to the effective time divided by the one for 2,000 exchange ratio. However, if as a result of the reverse split, a stockholder would be entitled to less than one share, a fractional share, any such fractional share shall be rounded up to the nearest whole share.

Since we will not issue any fractional shares as a result of the reverse split, but instead will issue one whole share for each fractional share which might result from the reverse split, we should not experience any reduction in the number of our stockholders. It is our intention that the reverse split should not reduce the number of our stockholders.

As stated above, we currently have 1,310,311,626 shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 150 stockholders of record. Following the reverse split we will have the same number of stockholders as before the reverse split. Depending upon the rounding up process of one whole share for each fractional share, we will have approximately 655,156 (or more) issued and outstanding shares of common stock following the reverse split.

We currently have no intention of going private, and the proposed reverse stock split is not intended to be a first step in a going private transaction and will not have the effect of a going private transaction covered by Rule 13e-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Moreover, the proposed reverse stock split does not increase the risk of us becoming a private company in the future. Finally, we have no plans to liquidate the company after the reverse split.