InvestorsHub Logo

NoWestminster

09/06/13 9:44 AM

#16291 RE: terry_mathews #16290

In the the June 30, 10-Q 2013 filing for CYCA, filed on Aug 7 2013, it was clearly stated under signature of principal officer that:

" PART II – OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS In the ordinary course of our business, we may from time to time become subject to routine litigation or administrative proceedings which are incidental to our business. As at June 30, 2013 we are not a party to nor are we aware of any existing, pending or threatened lawsuits or other legal actions involving us of any consequence. "

HOWEVER this is untrue and beknown to the company, directors and principal officers. Specifically the following lawsuits have been filed against Cytta:

CASE ! "Case :12-cv-00359- RGK-CRZ Filed 10/08/2012Federal Court, Omaha Nebraska Cytta, Gary Campbell, MVNO (a private Campbell Company), and Vonify become plaintiffs in amended filings to this case. As of 06/15/2013, the latest filing with respect to the above case, they are now included.

CASE 2. Case :BC 489862 Superior Court, LA California. Original filing date 08/08/2012 with additional subsequent filings.

Clearly the June 30 10-Q is wrong and incorrect and fraudulent.

CONCURRENT WITH above filing and reporting period,, CYTTA IS RAiSING MONEY WITHOUT FULL AND PROPER DISCLOSURE AS SHOWN BELOW (FROM SAME June 30 10Q)

"ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company sold/issued securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 as follows: During the three months ended June 30, 2013 the company accepted $55,000 in common stock subscriptions for 343,750 common shares in reliance upon the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Company did not engage in any general solicitation or advertising. The Company issued the stock certificates and affixed the appropriate legends to the restricted stock. None of the transactions involved any underwriters or underwriting discounts. All of the purchasers were deemed to be sophisticated financially and with regard to an investment in our securities."

INDEED