InvestorsHub Logo

xlt leader

08/04/13 6:32 PM

#39848 RE: ive been had #39843

IBH

With the risk of getting involved here. I think you are misunderstanding Post's comment. He is not saying you are wrong about the numbers. He is actually saying you are most likely correct BUT the order does not specifically say that and until it does there is a question mark?

His position is valid for how he trades and you are right to assume your position in how you trade. You are taking the risk in your assumption he wants to be sure, there is no reason to argue here. It is a matter of perspective.

Ipittydafoo

08/04/13 8:06 PM

#39870 RE: ive been had #39843

exactly IBH...this slight of hand, confusion argument is the last bastion of hope for shorts lol.

turning yet more great news into 'bad' that's been the technique right? hoping inexperienced, lack of diligenced longs will be scared into selling to let them cover/get out easier. all they are trying to do is continue to imply risk, when there is none.

lol....they shouldn't be worried about retail...lol...that's not what's going to squeeze them.

i am not a lawyer but i've done a great deal of work around the legal system. it is plain as day the judge has approved

A BASE OF 20.9% AND 3.5% FOR SUPPLEMENTAL THIS IS FACT.