XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[ive been had]

Your wrong about me selling, i would like to hold longer and possibly will be able to now that we are running i will still have skin in the game, but has nothing to do with the courts order he did in fact approve the 20.9 and the 3.5 that is for sure. He has yet to determine the damages because of the fact of no revs reported for the period. And vringo could ask for willfulness but probably won't, and the judge can award any amount he choses, but you said google get to submit their damages report and they don't, now i always see u on the factual side and admire that about you but google is to respond only to the damages vringo submits the court will not take their numbers if they offer any and their response will be labeled response to damages not google and all the others damages calculation, because judge does mot want theirs. Now i am right about the 20.9 and the 3.5 until someone on this board can show me otherwise, so explain to my why you think it is not correct, just because he didn't spell it out in the order? Does the order reference the 792 document in anyway? If he didn't give a direction on the calculation how will vringo do their calculation? If vringo submits 5 percent the judge would hammer them and correct them to use 3.5 of 20.9 just like he instructed the jury to use what was already given, this is the judges style for judicial efficiency he don't like to repeat things. You have to understand the court system and how rulings work, he did in fact approve the 792 in its entirety and if you disagree instead of saying you do prove how it is wrong cause he clearly says vringos request is approved, so so me the proof that i am wrong, you want to stop people pumping and misinformation but cannot provide any references saying that he did not approve the 792. It is craziness to say he approved and then say the 20.9 is not when it is in the 792 he doesn't have to spell it out. He just has to give approval and he can deny in part any part if it and he didn't so the doc is approve the whole document he didn't strike any of it from the record so the facts are with me on this.

And i looked at the calendar wrong i don't have to sell till 13th see the reference to 792 at the top?

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/virginia/vaedce/2:2011cv00512/271949/960/0.pdf?ts=1375536901