Replies to post #23399 on United Western Bancorp Inc (fka UWBKQ)

[Shomidamoni]

No Equity Committee in behalf of the shareholders. Not good.

[maxoliver]

Thanks for posting. I am still holding.

I find her below response to be a little bogus:

"the NOA was filed only for the purpose of the trustee given time to review the case"


Maybe none of the large creditors filed because they knew this was done.

However, one thing I noticed is the Company's old audit firm was approved by the BK court to prepare and file the 2012 return, so there could be tax refund monies available.

Also, what about the BAC monies?

[elcheepo]

There is NO settlement
Judge Amy, whom we all thought was brilliant at the time, showed this to us a long time ago

[sharing4u]

Tradeinman,

Question here:

What is your plan by writing up this story?
and on July 30, you wrote:
Tradeinman Member Profile Tradeinman

Tuesday, July 30, 2013 1:29:46 PM
Re: fredscott36 post# 23137
Post # of 23416
That's why 29.43m shares are on the ask for .0001

That's why BS withdrew the appeal, they were working for free to long and they decided the 60m to line their pockets was not worth it anymore. Their advice had to have been to withdraw the appeal. Funny, after it was to file a NOA.

SANDLER, BUFFY, and GUY finally sobered up and said "what, we filed a NOA? Why would we do that, we have nothing, we've been playing poker here. We have nothing."

Yuuuuuup. That's it.

[Reters]

guess i was right re; settlement, not gonna happen in the USA. See ABCP settlement only arrived AFTER a favorable ruling against the FDIC. They will only settle after a case is lost not before. INFACT the settlement there was for less then the judgement.

Glad I pulled out after i put a few things together.

1) stock was moving up on cult board memebers buying and thats it.
2) Settlement theories were baseless and did not make sense.
3) Freds posts while he sat on the ask

[Large Green]

Trade, keep in mind the Government attorney told you they would not, did not and would never settle or something like that BUT HE DID NOT SAY THAT First Citizens DID NOT settle.

So in typical Government fashion put the blame on somebody else and force them to settle, making the Government look victorious and then pay them back later as is their norm. AIMHO!!!

[G Bert]

Respectfully, this is a real "hot button" issue for today, but this post may not seem so sticky-worthy next week once we've all calmed down from our trip to WTF-land. No offense intended.

[RJM427]

What, if any, is the liability for this attorney and/or her firm if there is actually a settlement? She is a legal professional involved in this case and this cannot be overlooked, that she gave out previously unknown information. She has told a shareholder that there is no settlement and that information was used as a basis for others to sell their stock. Would she put this information out as fact if she knew it to be either wrong or misleading? I believe she and her firm would open themselves up to lawsuits if this information was false in any way. She did not say "there is no settlement from the FDIC", she said "there is no settlement", which opens the door up to other entities (FC) being included in that statement.

[ArtieB]

T- Are you willing to follow-up with Ms. Tyson and ask her more specific questions? I'm hoping that she will contact me this afternoon.

VC

[ArtieB]

T- Are you at all interested pursuing this situation further or are you satisfied with the circumstances of your conversation? Are you reconsidering your position in United or are you convinced that the contents of the conversation keep you on the sidelines?

Docsavage- respectfully, this is far from a dead horse. The pps is the dead horse, not the fact that material information leaked from the FDIC to a single shareholder.

VC

[ArtieB]

T- Ask Tyson if there is ANY form of agreement on the table or in process? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-disclosure_agreement She will not be allowed to expose the facts of the agreement, but since you already publicly shared her thoughts on the status of a settlement, I'm sure she's allowed to share if an NDA has been signed or is in the process.

VC

[Olti]

[Olti]

Can someone post anything regarding of whats going on in here this stock?
Thanks.
Ps I was here last year and see that legally this case is almoust dead.Any chance or legal going on behave of the shareholders.