InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 92
Posts 3805
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 01/04/2012

Re: None

Friday, 08/02/2013 10:34:31 AM

Friday, August 02, 2013 10:34:31 AM

Post# of 59646
We have personally spoke to Mr Rodriguez's attorney.

I couldn't help but think during the call, no, this can't be, probably because I didn't want to hear it, or believe it.

Here you go - do with it what you wish.


"The Board was opposed to filing the NOA, it was filed only for the purpose of the trustee given time to review the case"

"The government will not settle any case of this type", "there in no settlement".

"it was withdrawn, because all three of the summary judgement reviews were opposed"(lost) Had it been one or two, maybe the appeal would have been worthwhile. Because all 3 were in favor of the defendants, it was a much larger uphill battle"

"I have reviewed everything with the trustee AND....BS,... we have areas where we are trying to get assets "pushed" into the estate, I cannot state there will be assets moving to equity or any class. However the same 62 million you state as claimants in class 1-7, in the chapter 11 are not necessarily claimants in chap 7. They need to have proof of claims to recover at all. (Ques regarding having to submit claim), "I cannot give you any legal advice."

"There is no way the government would settle this or any other similar case"

DISCLAIMER - I am looking to lower my position in this lottery ticket.

BWTFDIK

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.