InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

-Awaken-

07/30/13 10:16 PM

#11164 RE: cpw13154 #11161

ROFL, the "last" pump, key word being LAST! hahahaha. Now we're talking about .23 when nothing worth talking about traded there, than we'll be talking about it "going back to the .30s" or "back to the.40s" as it keeps going higher and higher, ignoring previous jokes like sub penny 06 and teens. Those were the best laughs for me personally though i have to admit.
icon url

ahpinvestmentz

07/30/13 10:20 PM

#11165 RE: cpw13154 #11161

Curious cpw....

You keep referring to bad financials coming... please entertain that statement with what would be considered to be a "miss" or in your language "bad"

Revenue Guidance compared to yoy and from previous quarter?

Net income: provide either a (net loss) or profit estimate? (keep in mind that a net loss can be good if it is narrowing since the company is growing rapidly)

Margins: provide guidance of margins increasing or narrowing not just your opinion but take a stab at what percentage you think they will be at

I am interested to know your opinion with some merit/logic behind it.
icon url

My4ntoy

07/30/13 10:21 PM

#11166 RE: cpw13154 #11161

Very few shares traded at .23 on LTNC. I was bidding a BOATLOAD of shares down there and got NONE!
icon url

nit2win

07/31/13 12:54 AM

#11174 RE: cpw13154 #11161

I love these statements referring, as if, LTNC stock has only gone down, when in fact, this stock has been a huge winner on a bid to bid basis over the last twelve months.

Can't imagine why any comments would attempt to imply something other than the actual facts.

Also, there is a distinct difference between a company like Labor SMART that markets itself in an effort to attract new investors and company's that "pump" and dilute themselves.
icon url

nit2win

07/31/13 1:03 AM

#11175 RE: cpw13154 #11161

Definition of "PUMP"....

I believe there is a stark contrast between a company like LTNC that attempts to market itself utilizing factual information in order to attract new investors, and a company that does actually "pump" their company with knowingly false or misleading information, in order to create an artificial market in an attempt to raise capital through liquidity and dilution.

I believe that it has proven to be a fact that Labor SMART has NOT diluted themselves and has been utilizing its stellar performance in order to market and advertise themselves to new shareholders.

Can't imagine how anyone would or could find fault with that!