Replies to post #28557 on Lehman Brothers Financial SA (LEHNQ)

[etzetrade]

Very interesting, good infor, thanks

[hestheman]

In Sept. '08 I believe Barclays and Lehman had a plan put together of what assets/liabilities/obligations that Barclays would assume. At the last hour Barclays came in with an amended plan of what they'd assume and reject. I find it hard to believe that Barclays assumed many of the investment banking management securities obligations with CTs not being part of the deal. You know most likely, when the CTs were first launched to market they were pitched to Lehman Investment Banking Asset Management customers/institutional investors as a great investment "that even paid dividends". If Barclays did not assume our executory contract, there may have been another "highly confidential" deal that took place...which will still see CTs paid. Barclays (formerly Lehman HQ's) address is still listed as contact for LEHLQ's (the first CT to uplist and new info with JPM as transfer agent). Lehman's name is not in the company heading however. Does anyone know if the addy was always listed that way (with no company heading)? I still believe very big things lie ahead....G'night Hestheman