InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

my3sons87

12/27/05 8:58 AM

#136775 RE: osoesq #136772

Oso, something has happened. Check this paragrpah out from the DJ news article posted by Nieves.

On July 1, an arbitration panel ruled Nokia should pay the company between $232 million and $252 million in royalty obligations. However, Nokia contested the ruling, and filed a motion to stay the award. A federal appeals court later ruled in favor of Interdigital Communications.


icon url

laranger

12/27/05 9:20 AM

#136784 RE: osoesq #136772

Oso.

Agree.

Even though QCOM thought talks with Nokia were progressing for a GSM license, and were caught in The Snake's trap, IDCC's position is far different.

In addition to NY, final arguments are scheduled for January 30 in the U.K. 2G trial, and pre-trial discussions are scheduled for March on 3G.

I believe you're correct, that the parties asked for a delay in their letters to Judge Pauley. Proof of this could be downplaying the dismissal, and emphasizing talks.

But if Nokia agreed to talk, I believe Bill would not give them more than 30 days to sign or get off the pot.


icon url

Dave Davis

12/28/05 1:38 AM

#136983 RE: osoesq #136772

osoesq: These letters that the parties gave to the judge, are not they supposed to be 'filed,' even if under seal?

There has been nothing on these letters on PACER.

Just curious.