InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Optimistic Trader

07/18/13 2:31 PM

#8359 RE: hiphop #8357

I agree and disagree with you on some points. Yes, SFOR has had its financial issues. Wouldn't you think it would be hard to develop products that you felt the market would accept 7 years out, but then you found out that the market wasn't accepting until 3 years after that? The market is YOUNG as we have only heard of breaches/attacks in the multitude that they are in the last year or so. It is my opinion that it would be a struggle to have to go another 3 years until the market has caught up. The market is young, and SFOR WILL prevail even if there is a few more bumps along the way. The worst is over. Long SFOR!!!
icon url

Joe_Smoe

07/18/13 5:01 PM

#8365 RE: hiphop #8357

Hiphop- Once again I asked you to backup your claim of GuardedID patent being rejected. Once again, you had NOTHING TO SHOW.

Obviously, posting fluff PR pieces about pilot programs are just that, promotions for the company. What else do they have to go on at this point? Would you rather hear nothing from them? At least we know they have some irons in the fire.

I completely agree with other posters that the market is just catching up to the necessity of the OOB method of authentication. Sure, SFOR has been around a while, but all of a sudden, OOB is all over the place in the news and everyone and their brother are trying to come up with an OOB solution. That is why getting the OOB patent is CRITICAL.

I am not counting on any revenues from lawsuits. I just want the courts to establish who owns the rights and subsequent license revenue from this security method. Watch out when that is announced! We will have suitors for the patent AND companies lining up to pay royalties ahead of getting sued or told to stop using the patented technology. That could be very disruptive to an enterprise. Hopefully, this won't be a long wait.