That travon kid had a helava wrap sheet for a "CHILD" ( poor baby) but it was not allowed into evidence by the judge. If the judge in the (VPLM) case disallowes past convictions, (which I am sure he will), because it is of no relevance in a civil case unless (BLEAMS) attorneys open the door, than (VPLM'S) attorneys will surly introduce it.
well gentlemen i think we are off topic. My DD reveals exactly what i posted.
VPLM says those guys stole the company. The two guys that made the claim vplm has default against them pointing to the fact that these claims were baseless and they are not helping vplm in any way or form. I am not sure of any other defenses to defend the case.
Bleam on the other hand states lots of claims and state each allegation will be proven with evidence.
Its fact vplm has default against those two its facts bleam has default against platinum its fact bleam countersued vplm and platinum and kipping for fraud.
What is the point in deviating from these facts?
Personally i find it weird that vplm has default against those two guys. if someone come over to you and claimed the company you just acquired was stolen. This guy is your key to your case why would you have default against this person. There is something rotten here my friend.
Make you own decision / judgment on the facts. I am sticking to the facts and information available out there.
I also read shortly before this merger in PR vPLM announced parting ways with sasperbox. If this is indeed true that vplm lied about their services and assets when they had nothing then hmmm this is a big dooo dooo in my opinion.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
