Replies to post #10512 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[Biobillionair]

Vascepa and Pediactric Orphan status

Vascepa and Amarin have enough information to apply for a very impressive exclusivity status.

In July 2008, the AAP released updates to their lipid screening and cardiovascular health recommendations.[3] The more recent guidelines agree with most of the NCEP guidelines but are more specific, recommending precise ages and more aggressive repeat testing in high-risk patients. The guidelines state that pediatric patients with a family history of dyslipidemia or premature cardiovascular disease (defined the same as NCEP), those with an unknown family history, or those with risk factors including lifestyle (smoking, physical inactivity), metabolic disorders (eg, low HDL-C, diabetes mellitus), and hypertension should be screened with a fasting lipid profile. Initial screening should take place between age 2 and 10 years; if levels are within normal limits for age, repeat testing does not need to be obtained for 3-5 years.
-------------------
This market is more lucrative than "Marine", and if embraced would have extreme Marketing potential.

Williams

[sts66]

Lovaza/FDA approval/Cancer/lawsuits Any Attorneys that want the heat on the above info contact me, GSK's gonna be writing some checks in the future and the FDA's documents can help

Just occurred to me that our Adcom is now a huge blessing in disguise.....all of this recent nonsense about cancer etc. now has a huge public platform for discussion, and the real answers will be put down in writing by the FDA for all to see....game, set, match! Assuming AMRN takes advantage of the stage being handed to them, of course.....for those that talk to IR, start planting suggestions that they address these recently released fatally flawed studies at the Adcom so the can be exposed for what they are, utter nonsense.

[Iamastockgenius]

Bio,
As you know these types of lawyers will JPM on anything, remember when the Toyota's were supposedly not stopping? I think it was later figured out that four or five instances this happened.

I am not a lawyer bit see problems with this lawsuit already, it is one study, prove that the DHA in Lovaza causes prostate cancer. Remember to get damages the court must be convinced that just taking Lovaza, no fish the person ate etc., caused prostate cancer.

Not to mention many men over 60 get prostate cancer so if I was defending this I bring up those numbers. Anyone can sue, shoot you can sue me because I responded to your post lol but Winning is e hard part.