Max, you're changing the subject. All I did was refute your claim that any standards board has determined that any IDCC patents are "essential". Those who have licensed with IDCC determined that the cost of doing so was less than the cost and risk of litigating. Those who litigated in the current ITC proceeding have won in the trial court, subject to appeals to the Commission and/or the Court Of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and so far have prevailed. IDCC has thus far failed to prove the patents in suit at the ITC were infringed, and therefore essential.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
