Replies to post #11940 on Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[joenatural]

That was news to me, but if you read the defendant's motion made yesterday, it's very thorough .......

"Anyone read the SA article, any validity in this?"

[LouisDesyjr]

I have not had enough time to look at all of the details but I have two opinions on it:

1: I find it hard to believe that the law firm would not have made sure that everything was ok with what was filed.

2: From a quick search on what is a provisional application on the internet, it looks like to me that Worlds did NOT have to specifically cite to the provisional application in their patent application, Worlds just needed to make sure that the claims were substantially the same.

I did have some experience with patents in the past and was a 50% owner in two patents around 2000 or so (Shaped Multilayer Ceramic Transducers and methods for making same).

Louis J. Desy Jr.
[e-mail]

Disclosure: I added more shares to my position with the panic last week over the hearing date being moved.

[LouisDesyjr]

I have not had enough time to look at all of the details but I have two opinions on it:

1: I find it hard to believe that the law firm would not have made sure that everything was ok with what was filed.

2: From a quick search on what is a provisional application on the internet, it looks like to me that Worlds did NOT have to specifically cite to the provisional application in their patent application, Worlds just needed to make sure that the claims were substantially the same.

I did have some experience with patents in the past and was a 50% owner in two patents around 2000 or so (Shaped Multilayer Ceramic Transducers and methods for making same).

Louis J. Desy Jr.
[e-mail]

Disclosure: I added more shares to my position with the panic last week over the hearing date being moved.