InvestorsHub Logo

drog68

06/10/13 4:08 PM

#76329 RE: curtisw184 #76327

I feel they should seriously look at a CUSIP change. Another bio-tech company did it and it seemed to work. The mm's would be in HUGE trouble if they were to complete it

Castratrix

06/10/13 4:08 PM

#76330 RE: curtisw184 #76327

the ride to a penny will start sooner then you think...should break 0,005 one of these days...as in this week!

DarkKnight83

06/10/13 5:33 PM

#76341 RE: curtisw184 #76327

>Report MM Manipulation Here<

The more the better! This has to be a more controlled market! It turned one sided! Prime example today!

I don’t know about anyone else but I’m tired of the MM games on this stock! Every time there is a consistent gain on BMSN the MMs contain/minimize stock growth. It is a very disturbing practice which shouldn’t be pacified by saying the stock is consolidating! Intentionally putting a cap on the pps is illegal! We as investors must protect our interest and the only way possible is through the SEC! I already documented key days on which MMs clearly took advantage of the pps for their own interest! I suggest anyone with some time and DD on the matter to click the link below and follow the prompts! If there are enough complaints about the MMs on BMSN! They will promptly respond! This is for investors that want actual change! Complaining on the message boards will not deliver results instead submit a online report to the appropriate regulatory authorities!

IT TAKES LESS THAN 5 MINS! TO REPORT!

Filing the report will not put BMSN on HALT! They have an option as to who the report is targeted to, just click Market Makers! It’s the market makers we are reporting against not BMSN! The end result being the market makers involved would receive a hefty fine! And hopefully they will play fair with investors!

http://www.sec.gov/complaint/info_tipscomplaint.shtml

http://www.finra.org/Investors/ProtectYourself/p118628

The coordinated entry of quotes for the purpose of altering the inside market, painting a deceptive picture of market conditions, or inducing another market participant into buying or selling at an artificial price constitutes an "arrangement" as that term is used in Rule 15c2-7. Since there was no disclosure of such arrangements to other market participants, such quotations violated Section 15(c)(2) of the Exchange Act and Rule 15c2-7 thereunder.