InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

pennystockmentor

06/10/13 9:13 AM

#10011 RE: cpw13154 #10007

By "most", people would usually assume that to mean 51% or more. Please provide the source for this statement:

Most of these new places were existing locations of prior labor temps.



I can see that a few were in fact prior temp agencies. However, I can not find that "most" were. Also, I do not see how that has any relevance to revenue growth or lack of. LTNC is not in the retail business. The most they could hope for by leasing an old building from a temp company is easy recruiting for their work force.

Thanks in advance.
icon url

jmurfk

06/10/13 9:33 AM

#10013 RE: cpw13154 #10007

The funny thing is to verify my claims all anyone has to do is look at the information posted in the financials



Where in the financials does it talk about this claim?


they take up to 120 days before they take in one dollar from any of there new locations.

icon url

nit2win

06/10/13 10:47 AM

#10022 RE: cpw13154 #10007

REALLY???

LOL Really. Most of these new places were existing locations of prior labor temps. The revenues therefore are easily seen as being way down.



Another statement which lacks any credibility or ability to prove with verifiable proof. Not that it ould matter anyways since the quoted statement above has absolutely nothing to do with Labor SMART starting business in a new territory.