What makes you think that mgt tip off data not being good and why would they hold the results some 21 months after completed enrollment? Why not get mediocre results out like they did PC and explain it away at Asco?
<<I think management has kind of telegraphed that the data is not good>>
If true it will put a serious crimp in partnership talks and in the advancement of bavi. First line or second line, it is the same disease and difficult to explain why would it work better on the sicker patients. I am hoping to see a large late separation on the KM curve and maybe some complete remissions. That would certainly help with BLA or AA for Bavi.