Replies to post #6676 on Rambus (RMBS)

[docrew0]

Re: Clarification please


pruf,

If they agree it's due today. If they do not I believe they must submit the pleading the 14th and explain why they will not accept. I'm not sure what his nibs can rule on come the 15th? If Rambus is correct Payne “may” only have the attorneys fees to decide. At any rate Rambus has the right to reply to Samsungs Dec 14th pleading by the 21st.

If anyone has a different take on this go ahead. Currently the only thing I have to go by is msaba's 12/7/2005 post. Post # 6566

[smd1234]

On the 15th, this Thursday, his nibs will rule on Exceptioal case. Is this correct?there is a hearing on it, but Rambus has 'til the 21st to reply on the "no jurisdiction point" - see below

By the 14th Samsung will have to answer whether they agree to Rambus's rule 68 on attorney's fees? Is this correct?we know Sammy's answer based on the conf call the other dayLOL

By the 21st Rambus must answer Samsung's brief on prevailing party and attorney's fees. Is this correct?YES

see next post

==========
12/02/2005 95 ORDER that, by December 14, 2005, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. shall file its response to Rambus, Inc.'s contention that the Rule 68 offer of judgment, served on Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. on November 29, 2005, divests the Court of subject matter jurisdiction. Rambus, Inc. shall file its reply by December 21, 2005. Signed by Judge Robert E. Payne on 12/02/05. (kste, )(copies mailed and faxed) (Entered: 12/05/2005)