Your interpretation is not the meaning I intended. When I reread the post, I still don't interpret it in the manner you apparently do. In fact, at the time I wrote the original post, I threw TEVA in there as an example precisely because TEVA has so much experience running generics against patented drugs, and thought that background would give them interesting insights on turning the tables.
In any case, apparently we are in agreement that a company such as ELN or TEVA, which does not hold a statin patent, could potentially partner with AMRN to market--and potentially patent--Vascepa+generic statin combinations, and thereby threaten some heretofore pretty lucrative BP cash flows. Or perhaps I'm not understanding what you are stating in your posts; just trying to be clear on what I meant and am understanding.