InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

firefight4

12/09/05 10:02 PM

#55633 RE: Jim Bishop #55632

how about if someone calls into the conference call during the question portion and asks about CC's attempt to go after NetFlix using a company called GameznFlix ;-)
icon url

wickw50

12/09/05 10:03 PM

#55634 RE: Jim Bishop #55632

Jim Bishop, They may not mention GZFX in this conference call, but they will mention GZFX in a conference call within the next 90 days...
icon url

whizknock

12/09/05 10:26 PM

#55652 RE: Jim Bishop #55632

If it was that insignificant they never would have gone through the trouble to change their own website.

I don't think we get a mention either but there is potential here.
icon url

UABGrad

12/09/05 10:48 PM

#55660 RE: Jim Bishop #55632

Jim maybe not in Dec 2005, but in the not to far future GZFX could be significant to CC.

Their entire domestic earnings last year was 57.8 million. If we just say 1 sale a day (very conservative) for 625 stores and $30 a pop that would be 6 million/yr and that is darn near all profit.

Rumor is that the CC goal was 8 per week per store and that the pilots are running 200%-300% over their goals. GZFX could have a very major impact on CC in the coming years.



icon url

frankie_fillet

12/09/05 11:12 PM

#55682 RE: Jim Bishop #55632

There is probably more depth to the CC deal than the public knows. I would not be too hasty to put GZ down. If it makes half of what NFLX takes in that will make it quite the wage earner.

I also think there is more too the deal than 12 to 30 dollars for every sub. Like you say GZ is such small french fries why would CC even get involved unless there was more substance to it.

fwiw MHO

makingtheblingbling

real