Replies to post #34092 on XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[piratica]

JJ, where can I find the posting of google reply, or can someone post it, please.

[arper]

yes, I hope VRNG takes all the time allotted to respond thoroughly to rebut each point. But there IS a lot of BS to sort thru that I believe VRNG can rip them a new one on. At least I hope so. GOOG distorted much of Becker's intent and VRNG's intent in their languaging. I think VRNG can easily show how GOOG is misrepresenting VRNG's statements. Example: GOOG claiming VRNG says that workaround is irrelevant, and then basing an entire argument on that statement, when VRNG's statement IN CONTEXT was about the irrelevancy of the workaround EXCEPT as it related to a sunset date.

There are numerous strawmen that GOOG sets up in these 30 pages and then knocks down. The case law i'll leave to you and other legal types to ferret out. The (to me) seeming deliberate attempt by GOOG to misconstrue VRNG's statements should be spanked by any aware English teacher or debate teacher and hopefully, by VRNG's attys and HJJ as well.

arp

[Patentinvestor]

Of course Google doesnt want to oral argue their response. They would be caught in giving the details to defend their so-called workaround. By the way, doesnt VRNG have to agree to the workaround they implemented? I am sure Google doesnt just say they have one. It has to be proven to someone. Again, the good news is that Google does realize and have now admitted their infringment. Thats a win for all of us. The questions we seek answers to now will come from the judge. Stay tuned. This is not over til the fat lady sings.