I stand corrected, they do transmit a 6K to the SEC (see later about the word "filed". I forgot about the 6K since it is really a reprint of the Toronto filling and I never look at it.
I just reacted because they seem to imply that PTQ is a US reporting company and that the SEC is the exchange authority controlling them. They never mention the TSX and TSX rules.
I am not quite sure where the paper is going with that except that they do not know how to read a map and are asking for help. Several court rulings have been issued on the land right and they do not talk about it. My understanding is that the relationship between the paper and Fifer has never been good. That by the way maybe an understatement.
I do think the company should respond but the Inmet/PTQ agreement has a non disclosure clause so it is correct they need clearance from FQ/minera Panama.
This is the 6K explanation:
"Form 6K is an SEC filing submitted to the US Securities and Exchange Commission used by certain foreign private issuers to provide information that is:
Required to be made public in the country of its domicile
Filed with and made public by a foreign stock exchange on which its securities are traded
Are distributed to security holders.
The report must be furnished promptly after such material is made public. The form is not considered "filed" because of Section 18 (for liability purposes). This is the only information furnished by foreign private issuers between annual reports, since such issuers are not required to file on Forms 10-Q or 8-K.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
