Replies to post #231469 on Wave Systems Corp. (fka WAVXQ)

[aleajactaest]

hi dig,

possibly, but i haven't listened to the cc or read the transcript. it seems to be a waste of time to do so.

i just read the formal, legally-binding documents and listen to third party information. it's much clearer when you avoid wave's blind corner of success and just consider what is.

if the 10k tells you they are likely to require funding, assume it is so.

if wave's fortunes begin to improve, the written announcements will make it clear.

these things aren't even controversial.

[waveway]

dig. re: "And about all the stuff SKS said about the last $1m placement and that Wave didn't need it,"

I wish you would support your accusations with some quotes:
===============================================================
from the cc:

The last deal was done on a nonregistered basis. We were very close to a 10-K being filed, we had an investor who was interested in purchasing shares in an unregistered deal. And we felt that, that was an adequate transaction to do.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/1284601-wave-systems-management-discusses-q4-2012-results-earnings-call-transcript?part=single