InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

helpfulbacteria

11/30/05 11:40 PM

#102951 RE: GratziPrego #102950

Gratzi... Uhhhh... no...

You do realize--right?--that MANY of the investors here have been invested for over SIX YEARS.

Those are SIX Wave years, bud. Woof.

(Metaphor Crossing Ahead)

We're long passed our awkward "spike the stock by getting viral with the in-laws and coworkers" years. There are residual scars from the acne.

Best Regards,

c m
icon url

theguvna88

12/01/05 12:37 AM

#102953 RE: GratziPrego #102950

Hey cm;

If you and I really shake the bushes real hard tomorrow, we can drum up another 60mm share day like last time. Wanna do it? Got a couple of hours?
icon url

theguvna88

12/01/05 12:59 AM

#102954 RE: GratziPrego #102950

Hey No-Gratzi;

Do you remember this caution from the Biotech oard sent to you from the Admin??? Seems cm was right about needing new material ;):

" Posted by: DewDiligence
In reply to: GratziPrego who wrote msg# 14635 Date:8/19/2005 11:22:33 PM
Post #of 19555

Dear GratziPrego:

I sent you a private email about repeated “bashing” posts not because your viewpoint toward GENR was negative, but rather because I considered your posts to be annoyingly repetitive.

Perhaps you should reread your own posts:

#msg-6849415
#msg-6849537
#msg-7150158
#msg-7252906
#msg-7252973
#msg-7298365
#msg-7298509
#msg-7330598

I would submit to you that these eight posts carry essentially the same message, namely: “GENR is a bad stock, stay away!”

On iHub, readers expect posters to point out new information—or old information analyzed from a new angle. I had no problem with your first post, your second, or even your third or fourth. But I would suggest that eight essentially similar posts about GENR are not adding bona fide value to the discussion here.

I’ve seen some of your posts on other iHub boards, so I know you are capable of more. Regards, Dew



icon url

robwalseb

12/01/05 9:26 AM

#102961 RE: GratziPrego #102950

1998, gratz. eom