Replies to post #4877 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[luce onda]

That is a big question - for whomever is involved, it would have to be the hands of counsel, etc., and wish I had a feel for how something like this rolls out.

When I first saw coolair's post last night, I was concerned that maybe someone else "got there first". Went back to re-read Tom's shareholder communications over the last 6 months, and looked at some of the board posts after the conference call - wanted to see it hindsight helps. At least nothing that I read/listened to diminished the hope that we could be in play here, but realize we're still in guessing mode. Feeling optimistic, though, and hope we all get to see great news someday...before my kids hit college age, that is!

[pitcook]

Smars I agree, if it was our Goo, the share price would be at least $5.00. There are too many people involved in all of the processes that would look and see LWLG at a buck and change, and be buying it up. For years there has been hundreds of dots put together at Yahoo and here that have been 100% wrong. These incorrect predictions have raised the hopes of many readers of the MB and when they don't occur there is rage and accusations towards the officers of the company.

If shareholders haven't figured out that this is a SLOW process and things go at the pace that they go. As frustrating as it is, if this technology is truly going to change the world, potential customers are going to first make sure that it works over a long time. They don't want to put chips in devices and learn that after 1-2 years it turns to rust etc.

I wish that our dream order will be coming today or tomorrow, but I expect that it probably won't. Doesn't mean that it's the fault of the CEO or PR person. It's called science, and it needs to be tested and proven over and over.