InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Dead On Arrival

04/08/13 6:52 PM

#4776 RE: Dead On Arrival #4775

Also Red I have never seen a message board with this many intelligent posters. Some of these guys are amazing in the info they procure. I am not one for connecting the dots but if only three of them hook up, we are on our way.

I also believe Invesor should be a board moderator. He is a good medium for posters.
icon url

halfguin-halfmick

04/08/13 7:26 PM

#4777 RE: Dead On Arrival #4775

Agreed Prop. Although the conference call was very good, I must admit I was surprised about this 18 to 24 months design in window.
I kinda thought that once the LSS tested the devices and they met their requirements that some kind of production would start, maybe 6 to 9 months out and some nice revenue would flow. To hear that we now have to go through a 18 to 24 months design window was a little disheartening.

We should be working with all the microlelectronics companys in this datacenter application, because we have no guarantee that this particular LSS will use Indigo, and if they decide not to, then there are 3 to 4 others who may.

I just don't like putting all our eggs in one basket.

Actually, lets be honest, Tom didn't sound too enthusiast about Fiberlogix and Celestech, he actually called Celestech a thorn in his side. Thats what he said about Lockheed, and we know what happened there.

In my mind we are currently working with one potential customer, the LSS. We have to start working with more in the datacenter area, ASAP.
icon url

F2

04/09/13 6:35 AM

#4787 RE: Dead On Arrival #4775

'Behind the scenes a player is hurting us...'

Hmmm ... I guess that could well explain trading the past 2 days. Talk about curiosity peaked...

Sure would be a good time to see insider buying... if they are going to do it.

F2