Replies to post #24844 on Carnegie Development Inc. (CDJM)

[Milesblue42]

Explain why its not, False Information?

Maybe because it is not necessary?

So A company can alleged give the United States Government possibly false information....and then not correct it? How is this believable? Seriously

So investors are supposed to just go by what Gary is saying when there is SEC Filing for his 2006 Compensation that say differently. Who is supposed to believe this?

Doesn't this look bad when what the CEO is saying contradicts his own SEC Filing?

Why would he NOT want to get this corrected especially when it was said that the upcoming Audit was going 6-7 years? It makes no sense IMO...because wouldn't the new Audited Financials include his 2006 Compensation?

And if Gary is serious about Uplisting wouldn't he then want to make sure there are no errors with his SEC Filings? :(

So saying Bill Sawyer had an alleged Fake email address is okay but leaving possibly incorrect information uncorrected with the US Government of all entities is okay? WOW

If Gary's 2006 Compensation is wrong what exactly is the Big Deal with getting it fixed, this doesn't make sense. I am not sure if its supposed to.

Gary doesn't need anything and his shareholder don't need anything to stand in the way when he decides to go for uplisting IMO. Gary just get it fixed, isn't it the Noble thing to do? ;)