InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Lites2014

02/26/13 12:24 PM

#216184 RE: Imperial Whazoo #216183

really excellent post .. kudos
icon url

P2OBleavR

02/26/13 12:24 PM

#216185 RE: Imperial Whazoo #216183

Your posts state my thoughts. Keep up the good work.
icon url

Krazy K

02/26/13 12:26 PM

#216186 RE: Imperial Whazoo #216183

Very nice post! Couldn't agree more!

Lunch time lag here then we resume our rally!
icon url

jcoukr

02/26/13 12:28 PM

#216188 RE: Imperial Whazoo #216183

Excellent post IW!! Very insightful!
icon url

BigBake1

02/26/13 12:54 PM

#216191 RE: Imperial Whazoo #216183

Well unfortunately belief results in high failure rates, critical thinking however delivers the best results. The point of the matter is that there exists actual public documents that one can use to support a conclusion and produce real world logical conclusions. The SEC and FINRA have both gone through great pains to provide such documents for public consumption so to allow one to make an informed decision. JBII has no actual issues as supported by both the SEC and FINRA currently and their reports on such matters involving the potential for Abusive NSS, that is a fact that is supported by actual documents.

However I have yet to see a document that supports the belief of Abusive NSS in JBII. Conspiracy may have history behind it, but correlation does not result in bettering conclusion, many things can correlate and yet have absolutely anything to do with the other. Simply put the regulatory agencies have provided public information on the balance and reconciliation of trades to the public and yet that information is ignored as opposed to being used in producing better results. Not sure why such dependence is placed on the Daily Reg SHO for example and yet when it comes to the Bi Monthly Short Interest Report or the FTD report they are not relevant to forming an informed opinion based upon actual facts.

Worse yet is how the information from the Daily Reg SHO is misused and often incorrectly cited as proof of abusive naked short sales. Fact is JBII is not under short position attack either as per Bi Monthly Short Interest reporting. But what is often ignored is the fact that trades have trade plus 3 day settlement period in which to reconcile the trade. Unfortunately the Daily Reg SHO is only a snapshot of the INITIAL leg of a multiple leg trade transaction. FINRA does not provide a report at the end of the day showing covering and reconciliation of those initial legs and why should they since the trade has 3 days to be covered and reconciled if need be.

But one can easily place confidence in the SEC and their findings that here on the OTC using it’s entirely electronic trading process from trade inception to clearing and settlement achieves a 98% settlement rate on the same day of trade inception. Not sure why such facts are ignored while opinions are formulated on nothing at all.
icon url

jimmenknee

02/26/13 1:07 PM

#216195 RE: Imperial Whazoo #216183

Ok-- I think I get what you are trying to postulate...

Part I:
1. A publicly traded company provides pretty convincing evidence that NSS exists.
2. Regulators acknowledge issues WRT fails and closes loopholes to minimize the issue.

3. Neither JBI nor its supporters can provide any evidence that NSS exists in JBII trading.

... but, NSS is still possible in JBII because another company proved it to exist.

Part II:
1. JBI is developing a so-called "new" technology.
2. The "industry" (assume O&G) is threatened by it.

3. The "new" technology will never either eliminate or significantly reduce the need for the "industry" given the technology needs an industry by-product in order to exist.

... but, efforts to stop P2O from bringing its technology on line via manipulating their trading shares is ingoing.

So therefore, ignore what JBI has actually done/is actually doing to itself that has had/continues to have a direct impact on its trading shares in favor of a threatened industry in cahoots with market participants and regulators.

With all due respect, that is still nonsense and easily refuted by reality.