InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 131
Posts 4727
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/10/2004

Re: jimmenknee post# 216175

Tuesday, 02/26/2013 12:22:19 PM

Tuesday, February 26, 2013 12:22:19 PM

Post# of 312016
The fact that JBII's particulars differ from Overstock's is irrelevent to my argument.

I'm not about to do something so silly as to attempt to juxtapose the minute details of Overstock.com's experience with that of JBII's.

My point can not be refuted just because there are details of the two that differ.

I am not even arguing that that JBII NECESSARILY faces a NSS situation. I believe it is, but its not necessary as a construct in making my point.

My precise point is that it is, IMHO, both insensate & misleading to insist that NSS's don't even exist, and that therefore, there could be no such thing at work with JBII.

NSS is real and as such, it is possible in JBII's case. As to whether it actually is applicable, I'll leave that argument to other folks. I think it is, but thats an OPINION.

As a pragmatic reality, NSS's still do exist. They do happen by taking advantage of Canadian (and other) brokerage rules. They do attempt to BK small, vulnerable companies, and JBII fits the model.

Further, I get weary of the sophiticants who always act like conspiracy theories are typical of low rent thinkers.

My degree is in history and its simply a fact that there has never been a single intrigue throughout all of time that did not involve a conspiracy.

So the very notion that JBII, who has invented and brought forward a new technology that obviously threatens the economic strongholds of a lot of entities.... its is categorically obvious that JBII, given what it does and who this technology threatens, is a prime candidate for intrigues.

And I believe that all the defeated lawsuits that popped up, one after another after another.... I believe they were actually vectors of attack that were deliberately indirect.

And where is NSS found in my argument that the lawsuits are a vector for attack? Its not there.

I think JBII threatens a lot of deeply instanciated powers-that-be. Simple as that.

Whether the chosen vector of attack is via constant attacks of a legal nature or via NSS (or both) is irrelevent to my argument.

I'm primarily interested in contending that JBII is a logical candidate for being attacked and in contending that NSS is a real thing that does exists and could be a vector for an ongoing attack.

Imperial Whazoo

"Just my opinions, folks. Do your own due diligence & make your own decisions. DO NOT... I repeat... DO NOT make any investment decisions on my comments. They are my opinions. That's all they are... OPINIONS."