Elmer et al re A64 availability.
I think there is a lot of argument without a lot of content on this question. AMD has said September launch. That would miss the back to school sales window but allow for widespread availability in time for Christmas sales that really gear up in mid November. It is largely irrelevant whether systems are widely available in late September/early October, but critical that they are available in November in time for Christmas sales. I suspect that is the meaning of the Inquirer post, that A64 will miss BTS but be available in time for Christmas inventory builds.
Personally I will be disappointed if the A64 launch is not "real" with systems available immediately, but I don't think it is really material one way or the other. It is not reasonable to expect that A64 will generate significant revenue in Q3 based on current guidance. If it does I will be pleasantly surprised. It had better be a good chunk of revenue in Q4. In order to accomplish that AMD needs to lock down design wins in July and August and start to sell processors into the channel in September for the Christmas build. They need the real ramp to start in October. I think that is consistent with most of the comments on both sides of this "argument" so I'm not sure what all the fuss is about.
E