So you want the reporter from Dallas News reprimanded - interesting!
Let's look at the story and see where there is anything to be reprimanded for.
Let's see the reporter went to the Dallas office building and verified SRGE didn't have a office at the building - pretty weird, as it is listed in the annual report and on their website - they even state they are paying $16k a year fro the lease. The Dallas News sent two reporters to mexico to investigate the story - and you guessed it there wasn't a SRGE office!
The reporter tried to contact SRGE via phone calls and emails but he didn't get a response.
The building/tenant manager was interviewed for the story:
He also interviewed Antonio Neri Johnston who did the original story, he stated,
SRGE is the one who was suspended for issuing fraudulent press releases. The Dallas News just made the public aware of the scam.
Why wouldn't SRGE respond to defend itself if it were innocent?
Why is there no evidence to verify Davies actually exists?
It is amazing that anyone could still have faith in SRGE when there has not been any evidence to suggest they are a real company.