InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

snupoled

02/01/13 10:28 AM

#23833 RE: Spunkyknight #23831

Spunky,
spot on! I guess Simmes is saying"well golly we didn't do dd and ani didn't either" It is like a retailer saying "oh that house?
oh the one house I live in? oh I forgot I owned it oops"
Now Why is this happening? How do you invest on this news?
It seems to me that the time to go all in is right after the merge
before news,updates,safety study, launch happens...it will be too
late to get in once they report earnings for the first time after the merge because move would have happened....It is not profitable
being a retailer unless you are lucky at guessing...bpax for what ever reason wants it that way.
icon url

catty1

02/01/13 12:00 PM

#23834 RE: Spunkyknight #23831

Spunky: I don't understand why they would purposely do it. Please enlighten me. Believe me, I'm not defending them.
icon url

Winalov

02/01/13 2:13 PM

#23837 RE: Spunkyknight #23831

SK, The parties involved still can get away with all the mistakes, manipulation whether purposeful or not if at some point soon, before merger they let the PPS rise substantially and uncover the truthful reasons of their behavior to execute game plan. SH will quickly forget a lot if that would happen. By doing what they are doing now all the way, this will end up in courts. Maybe SH solidarity, in putting together a law suit months ago when you suggested it, would never put us in present extremely hard position. I still believe proposed merger is a smoke cover for something bigger.
NDA for LibiG? Influx of royalties? strong partnership?
Then again in the ligth of newest accounting revelations, is their cash position real? Maybe ANI merger is only a rescue operation for BPAX? And their real financial situation is only looking solid due to financial manipulation. But that would be a careless, fraudulent criminal activity hard to comprehend.