You're absolutely right. And WAGs should be stated as such, rather than peddled as legitimate info backed by secret inside intel. I have been here since Sept 2008. I'm not a new investor and I didn't have a hope raised myself. But there are many who are not in that sphere of knowledge because they're newer. I'm simply stating that guesses need to be labeled guesses and knowledge needs to be labeled as credible knowledge. Which one people are stating needs to be clear and there should be some accountability.
I agree with vodka. It's unethical. It's one thing to post about a theory about what might happen. It's another thing to post made up information with no factual basis whatsoever just to trade on such false info or to get Twitter followers. We have people on here posting about a supposed merger with dell when there is absolutely no connection between the two.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
