InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

NewMoney

01/25/13 2:19 PM

#212074 RE: Arthur Edward Whoof #212072

Except that JBII's fuel has already been evaluated and deemed to be quite a good product.


How perplexing.
icon url

P2OBleavR

01/25/13 2:24 PM

#212076 RE: Arthur Edward Whoof #212072

Were you at the last annual stockholders meeting. Seems like the company addressed this concern.
icon url

greenhornet

01/25/13 2:32 PM

#212077 RE: Arthur Edward Whoof #212072

Have you spoken with anyone at the company regarding your concerns? Have you visited NF to see the operation? I saw in an earlier post that you professed to have a financial reason to see the company succeed. They company is always happy to speak with shareholders.
icon url

WATERLOOO

01/25/13 3:38 PM

#212105 RE: Arthur Edward Whoof #212072

for starters carbon black is just carbon. that's why they don't call it carbon hydrogen

so if you crack a C2H4 ethylene molecule into methane (as you used for an example) you get C1H4 which is methane and C1 which is carbon black

u can draw a similar scenario to make any hydrocarbon chain of fuel backing out the excess carbon as carbon black. it doesn't need to bond with oxygen expecially in an environment where there is no oxygen
icon url

paige386

01/25/13 8:41 PM

#212126 RE: Arthur Edward Whoof #212072

I have a couple of questions for you...

if the fuel didn't work why would XTR and other customers be buying it?

How much will the feedstock cost JBI from a RockTenn site?

how much will it cost to move the plastic from the RockTenn cardboard recycle plant(jacksonville) to where JBI will convert it to fuel?

do you know if JBI has solved the coking problem?