Replies to post #12695 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[jaykayjones]

Jerry, if - after taking over - Judge Lynn reviewed Judge Sanders' rulings and found the inconsistencies that you hypothesised, then she might have decided she needed more time to evaluate these and delayed the trial to May 15.

However, if such inconsistences existed, then both IDCC and E would have known about them much earlier and lobbied for a change. So, in all likelihood, she would have known about these issues before she reconfirmed the Feb. 10 trial date.

In a roundabout way, I'm saying that I don't believe inconsistent rulings are the reason for removing Judge Sanders. JMO, JK

[laranger]

Given the history of sealed documents, I don't see how anyone has a basis for believing that Sanders made rulings that should be reviewed.

My comment only addressed the issue of whether Ericy might want a sharp judge and jury, versus a Motorola-type.