InvestorsHub Logo

bossboater

01/13/13 5:18 PM

#44032 RE: vegasvic #44020

yah he cant say much hes only saying what hes allowed it would be like insider trading on the replies i saw he said AT THIS TIME WE HAVENT DONE OR SECURED ANY FINANCING DEALS THAT REQUIRE DILUTION SO (AT THIS TIME) COVERS HIS ASS thats all so tomm they could release news thats says they secured a deal that requires dilution its just bussiness and the way it works pretty normal but you know that im not here to pump promote cheer or bash AMBS but i am long and strong and believe in what they are doing and hope i dont get caught with my pants down when everyone dumps on the D word

cmoney79

01/13/13 5:19 PM

#44034 RE: vegasvic #44020

Have you complained to the SEC about all the market manipulations?

WarpCore61

01/13/13 5:32 PM

#44039 RE: vegasvic #44020

vegasvic, please educate yourself on the meaning of insider information.

Your post suggests you clearly have a major misconception about the term. Gerald has responded to a number of shareholders questions, including my own. I emailed my concerns about the threat of a buy-out offer at this early stage. Gerald responded that the company was aware of the threat and were taking steps to address that concern, and shareholders would be made aware of those steps once completed.

A week or so later we got an 8-K describing what the company did to address that concern.

How is this in any way considered insider trading? I've read most of the responses others received from Gerald, and nothing he stated is considered inside information. He's not going to risk violating SEC regulations to satisfy some shareholder who is asking inappropriate questions he cannot answer.

Just because you believe it is insider information doesn't make it so. Go ahead and contact the SEC. When they read the responses posted here, they'll have a good laugh at yet another misinformed investor who tries to make an issue where none actually exists. Gerald should be commended for taking time to respond to shareholders concerns.

If you're not getting a response, perhaps you should focus on your approach and how your inquiry is received. Based on the email you posted, I would be reluctant to respond because it's clear your understanding of what constitutes insider information needs some improvement. Your email was threatening in nature and was basically an ultimatum to respond or else.

Here's a link that may help: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/insiderinformation.asp

Good luck with your SEC complaint. LOL