Replies to post #114364 on Southridge Enterprises Inc (SRGE)

[TenKay]

But all a stinky pink needs is a CA to hide behind...they become wonderful breeding grounds for the imaginations of the faithful.

[MoMoRaptor]

But you don't have a copy of the JV agreement KINROSS signed with SRGE do you? if you did you would be confirming as you are with CA, that KINROSS did indeed sign.

[Sooah]

Not "logically yes" but it is always the case. To understand this simple contract law, pull out a simple service agreement for mobile phone service or any utility service. Take a look at where the place of arbitration is and see if you were the drafter of your phone service contract. And, if you wanted to sue your service provider, take a look at where (city, state, country) the legal dispute must be filed or will take place. Not hard to understand. LOL.

There is absolutely NO legal basis for why the preparer of the document would TYPE IN the name of the company. Cite the legal basis for this.

A second signatory is not mandatory unless parties contracting are legally bound to have a second signature to bind an agreement as in the case of some European nations where corporations are bound under what is called Mitbestimmungsrecht. Even under this, a single signature can bind a firm.