InvestorsHub Logo

g0nz0

12/28/12 11:49 AM

#103447 RE: stervc #103442

Finally! Some Significant DD! THE HALT!

MoneyMad Man

12/28/12 11:51 AM

#103455 RE: stervc #103442

Blah Blah!! Why NO Divi paid today?? What bs can you guys come up with for that one??

Da Ghost

12/28/12 11:51 AM

#103461 RE: stervc #103442

SRGE


That is all insignificant .... eom

terry_mathews

12/28/12 11:52 AM

#103467 RE: stervc #103442

Please remove the sticky...it is not at all applicable. The contents contained within it is both false and extremely misleading.

SRV-90

12/28/12 11:52 AM

#103468 RE: stervc #103442

LMAO...still using the links that prove this was a scam?

Another failed "evaluation"....SRGE was a scam all along, right Sterling?

pitboss22

12/28/12 11:58 AM

#103498 RE: stervc #103442

"...the due diligence (DD) below can be read to understand that besides its trading status, nothing operationally has changed."

True.... It WAS a SCAM ... it IS a SCAM ... nothing has changed.

terry_mathews

12/28/12 11:59 AM

#103504 RE: stervc #103442

Respectfully Sterling, do you still stand behind your $17.00/share valuation?

Do you still believe the share structure is as you claim it to be in this post or did the 400 Million share dump the other day finally convince you it is bogus.

And being on Reg SHO, didn't I prove that was paper hitting the streets?

Just can't understand why this data is still being captured as being real and significant with a trade suspension on a pump and dump scam.

ib12u

12/28/12 12:02 PM

#103518 RE: stervc #103442

SRGE: "there is still hope for a positive resolution"

Really? What positive HOPE?!

The company they claimed to be doing business with has THEMSELVES since released their own press release stating that NO SUCH BUSINESS PLAN WAS MADE!



http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-26/kinross-gold-denies-joint-venture-with-southridge.html

What else is there to prove?

It was simply a calculated LIE;


that they’ve apparently profited from!




This is what Pinksheets DO!


and THIS lil-PINKY got CAUGHT RED HANDED!

terry_mathews

12/28/12 12:10 PM

#103551 RE: stervc #103442

Sterling, respectfully if all is so rosy from the operational side,

1. why did they have to lie about Kinross?
2. why can't they get a legal opinion letter for their financials filed?
3. why did they lie about Magna at the same time they lost their rubber stamp attorney's?

just askin!!!

terry_mathews

12/28/12 12:21 PM

#103590 RE: stervc #103442

did SRGE come out with their clarification PR as they promised today? seems that a silly little inconvenience like a trade suspension should impact operations and SRGE has a smooth running PR office.

maybe you can call down and ask Davies about that clarification release he promised.

Crazy Money

12/28/12 12:31 PM

#103634 RE: stervc #103442

SRGE is a BIG SCAM .. :-D

terry_mathews

12/28/12 12:50 PM

#103710 RE: stervc #103442

In case we all forgot about the warnings.... Below is FACTUAL evidence that never qualified as significant. I wonder why?

janice shell

12/28/12 1:20 PM

#103826 RE: stervc #103442

Since SRGE is suspended and not revoked, there is still hope for a positive resolution.

I really don't think so. There hasn't been even a mildly positive resolution for any suspended stock since 2010. They're all still languishing on the Greys.

And SRGE's registration can't be revoked, because it has no registered stock.

EarnestDD

12/28/12 1:55 PM

#103925 RE: stervc #103442

Kinda Blows those Valuations outta the water, doesn't it??

folks were warned about the SRGE scam.
jmo

terry_mathews

12/29/12 7:36 PM

#106666 RE: stervc #103442

Sam has done an excellent job of debunking your Mathers Research DD. Set up as proven for a one shot deal. one by one all the research points will be debunked before you as you leave that sticky up for all to gaze at in amusement. How many errors will be pointed out?

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=82895697

terry_mathews

12/29/12 8:05 PM

#106717 RE: stervc #103442

Stervc, with your vast understanding of short problems...

should shareholders here be pulling shares to prove a massive fail to deliver in SRGE like MoMo is suggesting? I suspect that based on your DD of the share structure you could help out here with this question.

BillEvans80

12/30/12 12:15 AM

#107071 RE: stervc #103442

The "distinguished Mather's Report" you list in your "Significant DD" seems to have forgotten to pay a bill.

http://mathersresearch.com/cgi-sys/suspendedpage.cgi


EarnestDD

12/30/12 4:14 PM

#107860 RE: stervc #103442

And now Mathers Research website is suspended too.

SRGE always was a Scam ... and any valuations were very misleading.
jmo

terry_mathews

12/30/12 11:34 PM

#108473 RE: stervc #103442

More Proof that SRGE Lies....

Jamesmobile

12/31/12 1:59 PM

#109069 RE: stervc #103442

Very nice DD stervc. We definitely do not know which direction this is heading but should soon find out. It is definitely a debate up for discussion and we can't draw a conclusion until we have all the facts.

As always, thanks for posting such thorough DD.

Abondanceinvest

01/03/13 12:30 PM

#112865 RE: stervc #103442

SRGE_SEC halts pinky that claimed partnership with Kinross


2012-12-28 17:33 ET - Street Wire

Also Street Wire (U-*SEC) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Also Street Wire (U-SRGE) Southridge Enterprises Inc

by Mike Caswell

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has halted Southridge Enterprises Inc., a half-cent pink sheets listing that claimed it and Kinross Gold Corp. had a "joint partnership" on a $550-million project. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) The SEC says there are questions regarding the accuracy of the company's news releases. Concerns include "certain claims regarding a joint partnership" as well as the company's plan to move its listing to the OTC Bulletin Board.

The halt comes two days after Southridge issued a Boxing Day news release in which it claimed to have some sort of an arrangement with Kinross on mining properties in Mexico called Cinco Minas and Gran Cabrera. The release stated that the deal valued the projects between $550-million and $600-million, but had few other specifics. Southridge included a purported comment from a Kinross spokesman that contained grammar and typing errors.

Within a day Kinross assured investors that it had no deal with Southridge. In a release issued late on Thursday, Dec. 27, the company said "there is no such joint partnership, joint venture, or other similar such arrangement" and it did not expect to enter any such arrangement in the future. The quote from a Kinross employee was "incorrectly attributed to him," Kinross said.

The purported quote was from Martin Moscosa, an exploration manager for Kinross. It stated, "We have made great and good progress regarding Cinco Minas property. Southridge controls the best area at the Gran Cabrera and there will no problem regarding the influencearea, also, because in case everything will be growing, possible adjacent claims could be incorporated or added to the project." Southridge's release also said that the company was working "hand in hand with Kinross" and that it expected to execute the partnership by mid-January.

The SEC's halt notice says nothing specifically about the news release. It simply says that there is a lack of current and accurate information about Southridge and its purported "joint partnership." As the regulator sees it, a halt is necessary for the protection of investors.

The halt notice lists Southridge as a company "purportedly based in Dallas," but Southridge appears to have connections to Vancouver. In its most recent issuer disclosure statement, dated Dec. 13, 2012, the company said it was originally incorporated in 2004 to explore projects in B.C. In addition, the company's articles of incorporation were filed by Stephen O'Neill. Mr. O'Neill is a lawyer in Blaine, Wash., a small town directly across the border from Vancouver.

The company's present management does not appear to have any local connections, but its former president was Alex Smid. In March, 2010, The Vancouver Sun's David Baines reported that a Vancouver Provincial Court judge issued an arrest warrant for Mr. Smid. The 37-year-old Vancouver promoter had been charged with four counts of tax evasion and tax fraud (none of which was connected to Southridge). The court file does not show any activity after the warrant.

It is not clear from the disclosure statement who controls most of the company's 843 million shares. Southridge said it had issued 723.1 million restricted shares over the prior 2-1/2 years to a private entity called Rockridge Capital Holdings Corp. to settle outstanding debt. The company did not, however, include Rockridge in its list of major shareholders. The only entry in that list was Novamex Mineral SA of Mexico, which had 200 million shares.

The SEC's halt lasts for 10 business days, or until Jan. 11, 2013. Once the 10 days have passed, brokers in the U.S. wishing to trade the company will face an onerous burden. They must keep up-to-date information on the company's financial status and on its insiders. They must also have copies of the company's prospectus, its most recent annual report and any subsequent quarterly reports. In addition, brokers must maintain current information on the company's name, address, state of incorporation, number of shares outstanding, the name of its transfer agent and the nature of its products. Brokers must also know if a price quotation is from another broker or from an insider. They must provide this information to anyone interested in trading the company.

Nobody answered Southridge's phone Friday, and the company did not respond to an e-mail requesting comment on the halt.

The stock, which has a 52-week high of 0.69 cent, was last at 0.49 cent. Southridge traded 419.1 million shares the day of the Kinross news.

Abondanceinvest

01/03/13 12:32 PM

#112868 RE: stervc #103442

SRGE_SEC halts pinky that claimed partnership with Kinross


2012-12-28 17:33 ET - Street Wire

Also Street Wire (U-*SEC) U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Also Street Wire (U-SRGE) Southridge Enterprises Inc

by Mike Caswell

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has halted Southridge Enterprises Inc., a half-cent pink sheets listing that claimed it and Kinross Gold Corp. had a "joint partnership" on a $550-million project. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) The SEC says there are questions regarding the accuracy of the company's news releases. Concerns include "certain claims regarding a joint partnership" as well as the company's plan to move its listing to the OTC Bulletin Board.

The halt comes two days after Southridge issued a Boxing Day news release in which it claimed to have some sort of an arrangement with Kinross on mining properties in Mexico called Cinco Minas and Gran Cabrera. The release stated that the deal valued the projects between $550-million and $600-million, but had few other specifics. Southridge included a purported comment from a Kinross spokesman that contained grammar and typing errors.

Within a day Kinross assured investors that it had no deal with Southridge. In a release issued late on Thursday, Dec. 27, the company said "there is no such joint partnership, joint venture, or other similar such arrangement" and it did not expect to enter any such arrangement in the future. The quote from a Kinross employee was "incorrectly attributed to him," Kinross said.

The purported quote was from Martin Moscosa, an exploration manager for Kinross. It stated, "We have made great and good progress regarding Cinco Minas property. Southridge controls the best area at the Gran Cabrera and there will no problem regarding the influencearea, also, because in case everything will be growing, possible adjacent claims could be incorporated or added to the project." Southridge's release also said that the company was working "hand in hand with Kinross" and that it expected to execute the partnership by mid-January.

The SEC's halt notice says nothing specifically about the news release. It simply says that there is a lack of current and accurate information about Southridge and its purported "joint partnership." As the regulator sees it, a halt is necessary for the protection of investors.

The halt notice lists Southridge as a company "purportedly based in Dallas," but Southridge appears to have connections to Vancouver. In its most recent issuer disclosure statement, dated Dec. 13, 2012, the company said it was originally incorporated in 2004 to explore projects in B.C. In addition, the company's articles of incorporation were filed by Stephen O'Neill. Mr. O'Neill is a lawyer in Blaine, Wash., a small town directly across the border from Vancouver.

The company's present management does not appear to have any local connections, but its former president was Alex Smid. In March, 2010, The Vancouver Sun's David Baines reported that a Vancouver Provincial Court judge issued an arrest warrant for Mr. Smid. The 37-year-old Vancouver promoter had been charged with four counts of tax evasion and tax fraud (none of which was connected to Southridge). The court file does not show any activity after the warrant.

It is not clear from the disclosure statement who controls most of the company's 843 million shares. Southridge said it had issued 723.1 million restricted shares over the prior 2-1/2 years to a private entity called Rockridge Capital Holdings Corp. to settle outstanding debt. The company did not, however, include Rockridge in its list of major shareholders. The only entry in that list was Novamex Mineral SA of Mexico, which had 200 million shares.

The SEC's halt lasts for 10 business days, or until Jan. 11, 2013. Once the 10 days have passed, brokers in the U.S. wishing to trade the company will face an onerous burden. They must keep up-to-date information on the company's financial status and on its insiders. They must also have copies of the company's prospectus, its most recent annual report and any subsequent quarterly reports. In addition, brokers must maintain current information on the company's name, address, state of incorporation, number of shares outstanding, the name of its transfer agent and the nature of its products. Brokers must also know if a price quotation is from another broker or from an insider. They must provide this information to anyone interested in trading the company.

Nobody answered Southridge's phone Friday, and the company did not respond to an e-mail requesting comment on the halt.

The stock, which has a 52-week high of 0.69 cent, was last at 0.49 cent. Southridge traded 419.1 million shares the day of the Kinross news.

terry_mathews

01/09/13 9:32 PM

#118270 RE: stervc #103442

where is the help and guidance to the investors working thru the DD in this sticky and the confusion with dividends given and taken away, cert pulls, SEC actions, etc....

front and center means front and center thru thick and thin. leadership is full leadership.

janice shell

01/09/13 11:04 PM

#118329 RE: stervc #103442

Are there any changes you'd like to make to that "significant DD"?

terry_mathews

01/09/13 11:21 PM

#118354 RE: stervc #103442

TA claims they have never received a cash distribution from SRGE and yet the TA is who makes the Divvy payment. How does that work?

Longs are finding out on their own that SRGE is a fraud. how does that correlate to SRGE having anything of value?

any proof beyond SRGE PR's that anything is real? can't wait for a positive outlook on this fraud.

TheFinalCD

01/09/13 11:34 PM

#118365 RE: stervc #103442

Ball in their court you say eeh-)


lets see if the WN comes or NOT?

terry_mathews

01/11/13 11:29 AM

#119465 RE: stervc #103442

Sterling, with respect to significant DD....

ETRADE would never speak directly to SRGE on anything and therefore any rumor of a reorganization would have to come thru official corporate action channels. A corporate action like a reorg would go thru the TA and FINRA and last I spoke to the TA SRGE had not even issued a corporate action for the dividend let alone a reorganization. Likewise, there is no FINRA notice of a reorganization.

Relative to dividends, ETRADE and the TA have both stated that the distribution of funds come from the TA. No broker, including ETRADE can identify the NEXT payment date until such time as SRGE files a corporate action with the TA and pays the TA to initiate distributions. Those are the facts and nothing ETRADE or anybody else claims is true unless the TA has the filings and capital in hand.

For the record, I had nothing to do with that other issue you raised – NOTHING.

terry_mathews

01/23/13 8:46 PM

#128865 RE: stervc #103442

How is this DD handling the grey markets and the exponentially declining volume. LMAO

stervc

01/24/13 5:09 AM

#129143 RE: stervc #103442

SRGE Due Diligence as of 24 Jan 2013…

Southridge Enterprises Addresses Shareholders With Corporate Update:
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=55970649

Below is the previous SRGE Due Diligence (DD) below. Please note that SRGE was suspended by the SEC as indicated, but has since resumed trading. The SEC Suspension has placed SRGE to be trading on the Grey Market. Please understand this before reading further concerning the assets that are believed to be owned by SRGE. The risks in SRGE are much higher on the Grey Market than they were previously when SRGE traded within the Pink Sheets on the OTC Markets.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=82861770

v/r
Sterling