Replies to post #36488 on DD Support Board and Research Team

[hedge_fun]

Thanks for the post. I am forwarding this info to the CEO, if that is okay with you.

Until I saw the court filings today, I just figured Bruce Klein had converted and sold TEXX shares without disclosing. I didn't think about Huffman and Pena hijacking the shell.

[hedge_fun]

TEMN ~ Craig Huffman question.....please.

Thanks again for the other info on TEXX. Trying to piece together the DTC chill on TEMN, amongst other things. I was also going to talk with Brandon Ferguson at OTC about this, but wanted some input first.

As you pointed out.......

Huffman did an S-8 filing for the TEMN shell

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=7967848

The S-8 (linked above) was filed in May 2011 and includes this about the OTC barred attorney effective March 2010. Not sure if you saw this.......

Team Nation Holdings Corp. will rely on the opinion of Craig A. Huffman, Esq. of Tampa, Florida for an opinion regarding the legality of the common stock issued pursuant to the plan. Mr. Huffman is not currently a stockholder of Team Nation Holdings Corp. common stock, however, he may be compensated for past services to the Company in such shares as offered under the plan.

The OS grows by over 1.2B in 6 months......


As of Friday, May 13, 2011 there were 811,316,782 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.001 par value, outstanding.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=7937338

As of Wednesday August 10, 2011 there were 1,044,492,271 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.001 par value, outstanding.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=8106083

As of Friday November 18, 2011 there were 2,137,279,527 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.001 par value, outstanding.

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=8256482

In September the chill was placed on the stock. Could this be related to the fact Huffman gave an opinion without actually providing an "attorney letter"? (This is my question(s)) How can he offer such advice, or can he?

Team Nation Holdings Corp. will rely on the opinion of Craig A. Huffman, Esq. of Tampa, Florida for an opinion regarding the legality of the common stock issued pursuant to the plan.

Of course he did write an opinion, didn't he? About the S-8.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1390891/000118518511000817/ex5.htm

Just for fun.........

Authorized Shares

On January 21, 2011, the Company's Board of Directors, and by a vote of the majority of the voting shares of the Corporation, approved an increase of the authorized shares of the Corporation from 1,000,000,000 to 2,000,000,000 shares of common stock.

On April 26, 2011, the Company's Board of Directors approved an increase of the authorized shares of the Corporation from 2,000,000,000 to 5,000,000,000 shares of common stock.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1390891/000118518511001373/R15.htm

Thanks, and if anyone has anything to add.

[XenaLives]

Can you explain how all of this relates to the alleged GESI financing?

Been following this one but haven't figured it out yet.

[hedge_fun]

So if Huffman was banned on March 8, 2010, how can he "legally" do an S-8 in 2011.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1390891/000118518511000817/teamnation-s8052711.htm

Craig A. Huffman, Esquire
Securus Law Group, P.A.
14036 Racetrack Road, Number 243
Tampa, Florida 33626

May 18, 2011
Board of Directors
4667 MacArthur Boulevard
Suite 310
Newport Beach, CA, 92660


Re: Registration Statement on Form S-8

Gentlemen:

I am acting as special counsel for Team Nation Holdings Corp., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Act"), of the offer and sale of up to 250,000,000 shares (the "Shares") of the Company's common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the "Common Stock") which the Company intends to offer and sell or grant to participants (as defined) in the Company’s “Employees and Consultants Compensation Plan” (the “Plan”). A Registration Statement on Form S-8 covering the Shares (the "Registration Statement") is being filed under the Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In rendering the opinion expressed herein, I have reviewed such matters of law as I have deemed necessary and have examined copies of such agreements, instruments, documents and records as I have deemed relevant. In rendering the opinions expressed herein, I have assumed the genuineness and authenticity of all documents examined by us and of all signatures thereon, the legal capacity of all natural persons executing such documents, the conformity to original documents of all documents submitted to us as certified or conformed copies or photocopies and the completeness and accuracy of the certificates of public officials which I have examined. I have made no independent factual investigation with regard to any such matters.

Based upon the foregoing and subject to the qualifications stated herein, it is my opinion that the Shares to be issued, when issued and delivered in accordance with the Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. The opinion expressed herein is limited to matters involving the federal laws of the United States and to the corporate laws of the State of Florida, and I express no opinion as to the effect on the matters covered by this opinion of the laws of any other jurisdiction.

I hereby consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and the reference to me therein under the caption "Interests of Named Experts and Counsel." The opinion expressed herein is rendered solely for your benefit in connection with the transaction described herein. Except as otherwise provided herein, this opinion may not be used or relied upon by any person, nor may this letter or any copies thereof be furnished to a third party, filed with a governmental agency, quoted, cited or otherwise referred to without my prior written consent.

Very truly yours

/s/ Craig A. Huffman

Craig A. Huffman

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1390891/000118518511000817/ex5.htm

Thanks......and great work as always.

[hedge_fun]

TEMN filed for summary judgement against Craig Huffman's......

claim that his client, Bruce Klein, is the rightful owner of CERTS for 60 preferred shares and 1B common shares. Huffman's case is bogus. NV SOS shows no designation for Class A preferred shares.

In the complaint filed Jan 22, ClearTrust is named as a defendant, but also an "innocent party". Huffman asked and got ClearTrust removed as a defendant and I just wonder if Kara's daddy.....Kyle pressured Craig to into having ClearTrust removed.

Original complaint: http://www.scribd.com/doc/206991953/Complaint-Victory-Partners-v-Team-Nation

Empire Stock Transfer printed the 4 Preferred CERTS, but ClearTrust printed the 4 CERTS for 1 billion shares. All without resolutions. Images of the CERTS are in the filing above.

Empire Stock Transfer made the news recently.

http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370541443215#.U2LHhtI3tqU

Hopefully ClearTrust and Huffman will too. Thanks again for your post.

I seriously doubt Huffman will respond. There is no case......PERIOD.

[hedge_fun]

Huffman/Kennedy mentioned your post in court filings......

in their current lawsuit "agin" an Ihub member. I guess he re-posted it, at least in part and so they diced it and sliced it.

This was their emergency motion filed last fall. I guess you didn't cause them harm, just the Defendant, who by the way seems to understand salvage law in Florida. I suspect when he brought up the permits SFRX lacked, that's when they decided he needed to be silenced.

See 13-19. And yes, Huffman has trouble counting.....

https://www.scribd.com/doc/281083227/Emergency-Motion-Darrell-Volentine


Their original complaint.....

https://www.scribd.com/doc/281084501/SFRX-v-Volentine

The Defendant is fighting like a DAWG and is not backing down. Here's Judge Cook's Order, though another Judge is now hearing the case. I think they thought he was just going to lay down. But I also think SFRX just wanted him silenced and never intended to go after actual damages until the Defendant starting fighting back.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/279245500/Judge-Cook-ORDER-SFRX-v-Volentine