Spokeshave -
You clearly did not read the post. Klaus was talking about the approach. An approach is not a product, and is not manufacturable
You clearly missed the point.
Your logic is ludicrous. By the same line of reasoning, it would make no sense to look at the weather forcast for tomorrow. After all, if it is not raining today, why should we consider the possibility that it will rain tomorrow?
I should start charging for straightening you out. Of course we should listed to the weather forecast as long as they maintain a reasonable accuracy rate. You guys just listen to the same forecasts that say tomorrow will be clear, warm and sunny but it keeps raining day after day. They don't recalibrate their confidence in tomorrow's forecast based on poor past performance. They just keep believing the new forecasts with no recollection of the past. That is in my mind the sign of very poor judgement on your(collectively) part. There are a couple here who have noticed that the forecasts keep turning out wrong (CJ comes to mind but there are others) but most others have not changed your expectations one tiny bit despite the many delays and disappointments. That's dumb in my view and the sign of a faith based belief system.