InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 2684
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2001

Re: Elmer Phud post# 580

Monday, 03/10/2003 8:49:30 PM

Monday, March 10, 2003 8:49:30 PM

Post# of 97772
Elmer: In other words you believed the hype.

You clearly did not read the post. Klaus was talking about the approach. An approach is not a product, and is not manufacturable. Once again, though, you insist on flinging your same old tired FUD (why did you choose that name, I wonder).

If I may offer some advice, pay more attention to what AMD can actually produce and less attention to the hype.

Your logic is ludicrous. By the same line of reasoning, it would make no sense to look at the weather forcast for tomorrow. After all, if it is not raining today, why should we consider the possibility that it will rain tomorrow?

What AMD can actually produce today will not lead them into the future. It is perfectly reasonable to discuss future products, and we should be able to do so without your incessant piping about hype and unmanufacturable products. You made your point. We all know that there have been Hammer delays. We all recognize the (ever more remote) possibility of a further delay. There is no need for you to save us from ourselves. How about contributing something worthwhile?


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News