InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Vader

10/26/05 7:17 AM

#99203 RE: TonyMcFadden #99202

E...and it's troubling, no?


Again, we are all here being fed old news and re-released news and we're supposed to be happy holders!
icon url

zen 88

10/26/05 7:20 AM

#99204 RE: TonyMcFadden #99202

Tony, VH- I emailed STM weeks ago,

and asked if they would be issuing a Q3 PR, similar to the one they did regarding Q2 TPM shipments. They said they would not be. Didn't consider it important enough at the time to post about, but obviously, that was the first quote that stuck out to me as well. It does not make sense, unless their 'over' is a pregnant number. I also emailed back to that reply, asking if the TPM numbers would be broken out as a separate line item in the Q3 financials, as I was trying to guage the ramp of this emerging market. They did not respond to that one. Oh, and by the way, I got that info without mentioning Wave.



icon url

Vacationhouse

10/26/05 7:32 AM

#99208 RE: TonyMcFadden #99202

eamon,ZEN, Understood, however, the first Million is news and therefore announced. The second third and fourth are expected business as usual.

I would doubt that there would be any public update. From here on out, I would expect it to be burried in their numbers.

FWIW IMHO ect. : )

Grand day to all!

VH

icon url

solas

10/26/05 7:32 AM

#99210 RE: TonyMcFadden #99202

Ok. I've actually read it now and I see what you mean. However, the TPM statement was just like all the other technology statements. All of the products had a similar "it was announced..." syntax. It sure would have been nice to have an update. However, TPMs weren't slighted.
-R