The reason I brought up the patents is because it was claimed on the board that ANTS owns no patents – and I was trying to get to the bottom of whether there is any truth to the claim. Is that so damaging - to ask questions and try to get to the bottom of the issue? T-Master, in all seriousness I ask you to correct me if I am wrong, because you apparently are more knowledgeable than I am about this situation… Is patented IP not the basis for the revenue potential of ANTS, and thereby the shareholder value in ANTS? Is the question of whether or not ANTS common shareholders can stake a claim to cutting edge, patented technology an irrelevant one?