I appreciate your guidance, Shelly. I agree that all of the removed posts deserved to be removed according to the TOS ... regardless of whether I would have removed them if I were the sole moderator of the PTQMF board. Again, my problem is not with the new asst mod or the TOS (or the old asst mod, Savlo, who has now been banned), but the mod policy (which, imo, the fact that Savlo was ever a mod is a strike against the mod policy).
I would simply appreciate it if mods were given more control over who becomes an asst mod, as per the old policy. On the PTQMF board, it has driven regular, quality posters away. Keep in mind that although the deletions were justified, many would not have been necessary had it not been for heavy-handed moderatorship (i.e., many of the violations were complaints about moderation).
I appreciate that my protest has been fielded. I have nothing further to say. My concern has been brought to your attention and that's all that I wanted. Thank you for your response.
we do enforce the TOS of this site. We do our best,
And there are many of us here who appreciate the fact that this site does enforce rules that make posting here a more pleasant experience than it might otherwise be. Those who want a free-for-all discussion board can always move over to Yahoo! or RB.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
